Skip to main content

Wimbledon Final: Djokovic's science defeats Federer's artistry

The Wimbledon 2015 Final saw Novak end Roger's dream of an eighth Wimbledon title, and in the process claiming his 3rd SW19 title and his 9th Grand Slam in total. This puts him at 5 on the all time list of Open Era champions.

List of players with most Grand Slam titles in the Open Era:


Rank
Player
Total
1
 Roger Federer
17
2
 Pete Sampras
14
 Rafael Nadal
14
4
 Björn Borg
11
5
 Novak Djokovic
9

The first two sets were very close, with the two opposing styles producing some great tennis. It was really in the third set where the scientific approach from Novak began to wear down the Federer challenge. It was clear that Novak's consistency and precision took it's toll on Roger physically but more importantly psychologically. 

Shut out
Early in the 3rd set there was short break to get the covers on and that appeared to be the final turning point to end the challenge from Roger. The artist's errors began to grow in numbers as he felt the need to give that little bit extra on each ball. This was largely due to Novak's pressure and consistency. Everyone had talked about Roger's serve as the weapon that would underpin his quest for 2015 Wimbledon glory, but again this was neutralised by Novak's pressure. Andy Murray in the semi final didn't put the same pressure on the return and additionally his second serve gave Roger many chances to attack. Novak's serve, especially on big points, didn't give Roger the same opportunities. Whenever Roger had those half chances, he tried too hard and the unforced error count grew. 

Crowd silenced
The Wimbledon crowd were overwhelmingly in favour of Roger, but Novak's play and the break for to get the covers on for a brief period seemed to dampen the crowd's spirits. The crowd were never really given the same hope as they'd experienced in sets 1 and 2. In the end for the Federer fans it was an anticlimactic conclusion and in hindsight more inevitable than had probably been thought (rather stupidly I too had underestimated Novak's ability to execute).

A notable difference between this match and the Roland Garros final last month where Novak lost in 4 sets to Stan Wawrinka came down to power. Stan's artistry was backed with a lot of power, so those stylish one handed backhands down the line were never coming back. Roger no longer (or maybe never had) has that type of power on the backhand side as we've seen from Stan in the past few seasons. As a result it made it even more difficult for him to get points on the board.

Djokovic to dominate
With the decline of Nadal and less so of Federer and Murray, Djokovic's serious challengers in the slams are few and far between. Stan Wawrinka appears to be Djokovic's number 1 nemesis in tennis right now, but Stan's consistency means we are never sure how far he will go in any given slam. 
If we refer back to the all time leader's list of Grand Slam titles in the Open Era, it is likely that Djokovic will surpass Sampras and Rafa who sit at 14. 
Having turned 28 in May this year, it isn't hard to imagine Novak having at least another 4 years at the top as he is arguably the greatest athlete in the sport's history. For example, between now and the end of the 2018 season there are 13 slams to play for. It isn't too difficult to imagine Novak winning 6 or 7 or possibly more. If he wins 6 that takes him to 15 and just 2 away from Federer. I wouldn't bet against Novak equalling or even surpassing Roger's amazing record. What is interesting, when we compare him to the other leaders he is relatively old on the day of his 9th slam victory.

Age when they won their 9th Grand Slam:
- Bjorg - Roland Garros on 8th June, 1980. Age: 24
- Sampras - Australian Open on 26th January 1997. Age: 25
- Federer - US Open on 10th September 2006. Age: 25
- Nadal - US Open on 13th September 2010. Age: 24
- Djokovic - Wimbledon on 12th June 2015. Age: 28






Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Big Four has become the Big Two - US Open 2016

There is no question that the Big Four of tennis is no longer. Whilst Federer and Nadal are still active and producing high level tennis, they don't have that edge anymore to win slams (hope they prove me wrong).  The 'Big Two' has definitely been the case for the 2016 season as Murray and Djokovic have played each other in two finals at Australia and RG with Murray having made all 3 to date. Including the US Open Final of 2011, when Djokovic lost to Nadal, either Djokovic or Murray have been in 21 of the 24 finals since then. They have met in 7 of those finals and Djokovic leads the H2H 5-2. It feels like Murray's current form will see him take his fourth career Grand Slam in New York and I see Djokovic making the final, this will take the series to 5-3. The Lendl factor has by no coincidence changed Murray's fortune in their second stint together, he is such a calming influence on Murray and enables Murray to play his best tennis. In hindsight looking at the fi...

The GOAT battle is still alive.. Federer v Nadal

After today's easy win for Nadal, he now sits at 15 Grand Slam wins and only 3 behind Federer. Nadal wins his 10th Roland Garros title, another record! We all love the 'greatest of all time' debates in sport but in tennis being individual is a little more clean cut than team sports such as football... or is it? How do we begin to compare the greatest tennis players of all time? I mean we would expect Nadal or Federer to easily defeat Bjorn Borg or Rod Laver if they used the physical tools of their respective eras. Sport evolves and to call out the greatest of all time is always a hypothetical or statistical argument, but something that can never be proven no matter how emotional the debate becomes. In tennis circles, there is a rare concurrency in views that the greatest players in the history of the sport are still active.. very active based on the last two Grand Slam results. We usually wait until players finish out their careers so we can then apply our 'ob...

Is Djokovic the Villain in the Federer Pantomime?

The Federer v. Djokovic rivalry has become a classic hero v. villain narrative that has been played out 48 times to date. Like any of these stories, the longer the villain has power over the hero, the more anger is pointed towards the villain. The Hero  Federer hits a forehand v Nadal at Wimbledon 2019  The dictionary tells us it is 'a person who is admired for their courage, outstanding achievements, or noble qualities.' Etymologically the word Hero comes from Greek hērōs meaning demi-god or illustrious man.This is of uncertain origin; perhaps originally "defender or protector". Roland Garros in the 1990s became even more specialised in terms of who had a chance of winning it outright. A lot of the champions at Roland Garros in the 90's and early 00's would see their only Grand Slam victories coming on the clay, that was the level of specialisation on that surface. When Nadal managed the RG and Wimbledon double in 2008 it was hailed as a miraculous...