Skip to main content

Wimbledon Final: Djokovic's science defeats Federer's artistry

The Wimbledon 2015 Final saw Novak end Roger's dream of an eighth Wimbledon title, and in the process claiming his 3rd SW19 title and his 9th Grand Slam in total. This puts him at 5 on the all time list of Open Era champions.

List of players with most Grand Slam titles in the Open Era:


Rank
Player
Total
1
 Roger Federer
17
2
 Pete Sampras
14
 Rafael Nadal
14
4
 Björn Borg
11
5
 Novak Djokovic
9

The first two sets were very close, with the two opposing styles producing some great tennis. It was really in the third set where the scientific approach from Novak began to wear down the Federer challenge. It was clear that Novak's consistency and precision took it's toll on Roger physically but more importantly psychologically. 

Shut out
Early in the 3rd set there was short break to get the covers on and that appeared to be the final turning point to end the challenge from Roger. The artist's errors began to grow in numbers as he felt the need to give that little bit extra on each ball. This was largely due to Novak's pressure and consistency. Everyone had talked about Roger's serve as the weapon that would underpin his quest for 2015 Wimbledon glory, but again this was neutralised by Novak's pressure. Andy Murray in the semi final didn't put the same pressure on the return and additionally his second serve gave Roger many chances to attack. Novak's serve, especially on big points, didn't give Roger the same opportunities. Whenever Roger had those half chances, he tried too hard and the unforced error count grew. 

Crowd silenced
The Wimbledon crowd were overwhelmingly in favour of Roger, but Novak's play and the break for to get the covers on for a brief period seemed to dampen the crowd's spirits. The crowd were never really given the same hope as they'd experienced in sets 1 and 2. In the end for the Federer fans it was an anticlimactic conclusion and in hindsight more inevitable than had probably been thought (rather stupidly I too had underestimated Novak's ability to execute).

A notable difference between this match and the Roland Garros final last month where Novak lost in 4 sets to Stan Wawrinka came down to power. Stan's artistry was backed with a lot of power, so those stylish one handed backhands down the line were never coming back. Roger no longer (or maybe never had) has that type of power on the backhand side as we've seen from Stan in the past few seasons. As a result it made it even more difficult for him to get points on the board.

Djokovic to dominate
With the decline of Nadal and less so of Federer and Murray, Djokovic's serious challengers in the slams are few and far between. Stan Wawrinka appears to be Djokovic's number 1 nemesis in tennis right now, but Stan's consistency means we are never sure how far he will go in any given slam. 
If we refer back to the all time leader's list of Grand Slam titles in the Open Era, it is likely that Djokovic will surpass Sampras and Rafa who sit at 14. 
Having turned 28 in May this year, it isn't hard to imagine Novak having at least another 4 years at the top as he is arguably the greatest athlete in the sport's history. For example, between now and the end of the 2018 season there are 13 slams to play for. It isn't too difficult to imagine Novak winning 6 or 7 or possibly more. If he wins 6 that takes him to 15 and just 2 away from Federer. I wouldn't bet against Novak equalling or even surpassing Roger's amazing record. What is interesting, when we compare him to the other leaders he is relatively old on the day of his 9th slam victory.

Age when they won their 9th Grand Slam:
- Bjorg - Roland Garros on 8th June, 1980. Age: 24
- Sampras - Australian Open on 26th January 1997. Age: 25
- Federer - US Open on 10th September 2006. Age: 25
- Nadal - US Open on 13th September 2010. Age: 24
- Djokovic - Wimbledon on 12th June 2015. Age: 28






Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Big Two make Australian Open Final 2013

As I predicted in my last post it would be a Murray and Djokovic Final in Australia, also citing Murray's triumph over Federer in the semi (wish I had've put my money where my blog is). There is no doubt in the tennis world that Novak Djokovic and Andy Murray have played the best tennis in the past 6 months. Many predicted after Murray's breakthrough victory at Flushing Meadows that this was the dawn of tennis' new big rivalry. Rafa and Roger have served up the greatest rivalry in tennis history that spans back to 2004. Having played 8 Grand Slam finals (Rafa leads 6-2) and winning 28 titles between them, makes it the greatest. The question is can Rafa or Federer make it to any more finals? The chances of them both making a final against each other seems even less likely. That's mainly due to the rise of Novak, and more recently Andy. Could the greatest tennis rivalry ever be handing a baton to another of the greatest rivalries? The fact that this top four has

Grand Slam Averages 2011 The Big Four

I have compiled averages from all matches played at the slams in 2011.  It is interesting how the points won averages (%) are in order of how the rankings finished for the year. When you look at Djokovic you can see he has the best averages overall, as his three victories would have suggested. Djokovic and Federer are the guys that impress the most when it comes to percentage of service points won, with Federer having a slight edge. In terms of percentage of return points won it is Nadal who is the strongest with Djokovic a close second. They both win more than 60% of points on their opponents second serve, which is very impressive. These numbers express what we already know in terms of both players ability to outrally their opponents from the baseline. It also means for Murray or Federer to get victories, a high first serve percentage is vital. The big question is can Djokovic keep this level going in 2012. His averages when winning this years Australian Open d

The Big Three Domination, is there an end in sight?

The Big Four has been the Big Three for longer than we think Whilst in the past we discussed the 'Big Four', it really has been only the 'Big Three' (referred to as BT) all along when we look back in time. Murray was a great challenger to the BT but as time moves on, the BT with Andy just outside it makes more sense than discussing a 'Big Four'. Nadal in action at Wimbledon 2019 Nadal's win at US Open Some will suggest that Rafa got an 'easy' US Open win by not having to defeat his toughest rivals en-route to the title. Federer and Djokovic both went out rather timidly. Federer went out in 5 sets to Dimitrov in the Quarter final and was clearly struggling with back pain. Djokovic had to retire in his Round of 16 match against Wawrinka. You could argue that this made it a more straightforward title for Nadal (I am sure Medvedev would argue this point). When we look at the data it provides some interesting insights. Below shows Grand