Djokovic Grand Slam averages 2012 v 2011, so far..

With the Australian Open being the only completed Grand Slam so far in 2012, this comparison will be more complete when Roland Garros finishes on Sunday. So the stats below only show the Australian Open matches.

I have taken the Big Four and compared their averages for 2011 to their performance at Australia in 2012.

First, lets look at the World Number 1, Djokovic. It is interesting how his match time increased significantly. He had those two epic five set matches in the semi and also in the final.

It also shows that he wasn't as strong on winning points on his serve, but made up for that when returning. His first serve percentage dropped significantly at Australia, which may have attributed to his longer matches. On overall points won his percentage increased, so it showed he was still in top form with the stats proving again why he is ranked number 1.

Comments

Is Djokovic the Villain in the Federer Pantomime?

The Federer v. Djokovic rivalry has become a classic hero v. villain narrative that has been played out 48 times to date. Like any of these stories, the longer the villain has power over the hero, the more anger is pointed towards the villain. The Hero Federer hits a forehand v Nadal at Wimbledon 2019 The dictionary tells us it is 'a person who is admired for their courage, outstanding achievements, or noble qualities.' Etymologically the word Hero comes from Greek hērōs meaning demi-god or illustrious man.This is of uncertain origin; perhaps originally "defender or protector". Roland Garros in the 1990s became even more specialised in terms of who had a chance of winning it outright. A lot of the champions at Roland Garros in the 90's and early 00's would see their only Grand Slam victories coming on the clay, that was the level of specialisation on that surface. When Nadal managed the RG and Wimbledon double in 2008 it was hailed as a miraculous...

The GOAT battle is still alive.. Federer v Nadal

After today's easy win for Nadal, he now sits at 15 Grand Slam wins and only 3 behind Federer. Nadal wins his 10th Roland Garros title, another record! We all love the 'greatest of all time' debates in sport but in tennis being individual is a little more clean cut than team sports such as football... or is it? How do we begin to compare the greatest tennis players of all time? I mean we would expect Nadal or Federer to easily defeat Bjorn Borg or Rod Laver if they used the physical tools of their respective eras. Sport evolves and to call out the greatest of all time is always a hypothetical or statistical argument, but something that can never be proven no matter how emotional the debate becomes. In tennis circles, there is a rare concurrency in views that the greatest players in the history of the sport are still active.. very active based on the last two Grand Slam results. We usually wait until players finish out their careers so we can then apply our 'ob...

Interesting Grand Slam stats from 2011 for Federer and Nadal

Very close in many ways.. As Federer and Nadal go into battle for the 29th time, their past throws up some interesting stats. Nadal leads the head to head 17-9 with 9 Grand Slams matches, out of which Federer has only won 2. His last victory came in one the five setter epic Wimbledon finals back in 2007. 2011 was supposedly a year in which Federer went into decline, but when broken down into plain numbers it doesn't seem that way at all. It is actually quite close overall, but one thing that may gain attention is how Nadal seems to work harder for his points. As shown below, Nadal took an average of 20 minutes more to finish a match. The numbers would also suggest Nadal was much more aggressive on the opponents second serve. However, Federer's serving stats are more solid and he would appear to get easier points on both first and second serves. The coolest stat is the fact that they won the exact same percentage of points played over the four slams at 56...

Tennis Stats for The Big Four

Search This Blog