Skip to main content

Olympic Gold: Is Murray moving to top of Big Four?

Andy Murray's destruction of Roger Federer at Centre Court yesterday was evidence of his potential to win big. This was something that Federer is not used to experiencing, this was a super performance by Murray. Maybe he can move on to top the Big Four, and maybe even do it by the end of 2012.

Murray played yesterday with pure focus and looked very composed for the full match. This was his first ever victory over Federer in a best of 5 sets, only giving away a measly 7 games to games greatest ever player.

The Wimbledon final was hyped so much that there was huge pressure on the Scot's shoulders. In that final Federer produced some genius shots at key moments to win out in the end. However, what Murray showed yesterday is that when relaxed he can hit those big winners at the key points too.

These are the big points that separate the Grand Slam winners. Djokovic in the past 12 months has produced so many of those, the best being the forehand at last year's US Open when 40-15 down on Federer's first serve. We have seen numerous big plays from Rafa and Federer in the past, which have contributed to the 28 Grand Slams they have won between them. These big point winners go hand in hand with true self belief.

Murray among giants of Tennis, Del Potro in size and Federer for stature
The Olympic Gold Medal for Murray was a coming of age. It may not be a Grand Slam but it is now a huge thing to win in Tennis, and it will continue to get more important as years go by one feels.

This win will give Murray the belief to go on and win some Grand Slams and the potential for him is huge. There is no reason why he can't win 4 or 5 in the next few years. He definitely has the talent, skills and physicality, yesterday he showed he the mentality too.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is Djokovic the Villain in the Federer Pantomime?

The Federer v. Djokovic rivalry has become a classic hero v. villain narrative that has been played out 48 times to date. Like any of these stories, the longer the villain has power over the hero, the more anger is pointed towards the villain. The Hero  Federer hits a forehand v Nadal at Wimbledon 2019  The dictionary tells us it is 'a person who is admired for their courage, outstanding achievements, or noble qualities.' Etymologically the word Hero comes from Greek hērōs meaning demi-god or illustrious man.This is of uncertain origin; perhaps originally "defender or protector". Roland Garros in the 1990s became even more specialised in terms of who had a chance of winning it outright. A lot of the champions at Roland Garros in the 90's and early 00's would see their only Grand Slam victories coming on the clay, that was the level of specialisation on that surface. When Nadal managed the RG and Wimbledon double in 2008 it was hailed as a miraculous...

The GOAT battle is still alive.. Federer v Nadal

After today's easy win for Nadal, he now sits at 15 Grand Slam wins and only 3 behind Federer. Nadal wins his 10th Roland Garros title, another record! We all love the 'greatest of all time' debates in sport but in tennis being individual is a little more clean cut than team sports such as football... or is it? How do we begin to compare the greatest tennis players of all time? I mean we would expect Nadal or Federer to easily defeat Bjorn Borg or Rod Laver if they used the physical tools of their respective eras. Sport evolves and to call out the greatest of all time is always a hypothetical or statistical argument, but something that can never be proven no matter how emotional the debate becomes. In tennis circles, there is a rare concurrency in views that the greatest players in the history of the sport are still active.. very active based on the last two Grand Slam results. We usually wait until players finish out their careers so we can then apply our 'ob...

2019 Wimbledon Final: What does Federer need to do to stop Djokovic eating grass?

Today's Wimbledon Final between two of the greatest ever is almost sure to be a classic. This rivalry rarely throws up a match that isn't a classic.  Djokovic is Number 1 for a Reason Djokovic is deservedly seeded 1 and favourite to regain his title. His record this year has been been to win 90% of his matches, with only 1 Grand Slam loss in 2019 and that has been his only loss since Roland Garros in 2018. Federer's record for 2019 and Career win-loss are also very impressive numbers.  With 2 losses in Slams so far, to Nadal at Roland Garros at the Semi-Final stage and the shock loss to Tsitsipas in Australia. Head to Head  Djokovic has a slight advantage their Head to Head. Federer's last win against Djokovic was at the 2015 ATP Finals in London. They have just played on 3 occasions since with Djokovic taking all 3 matches. Just one of those was in the Slams at the 2016 Australian. They had 2 meetings in 2018 and the last of those was a...