US Open Final: What do the stats suggest?

As we enter today's final of the US Open, Novak Djokovic goes in as slight favourite. Djokovic is the defending Champion and leads the Head to Head with Murray 8-6.

Interestingly, they have only met twice in the Slams and that was at the 2011 Australian Open final, and again this year in Melbourne at the Semi Final stage. In that 2011 final Djokovic stormed to a 6-4, 6-2, 6-3 victory and Murray never really got into the match. Djokovic did go on to dominate 2011 with some of the most amazing tennis we have seen. This year's semi final at Australia was a much tighter affair finishing 6-3, 3-6, 6-7(4), 6-1, 7-5. This was an epic match and Murray showed he was able to match the Serb for the vast majority of the 4 hours 50 minutes battle.

If we look at the stats below, it would suggest Djokovic is also showing to be in slightly better shape than Murray. When compared side by side in 2012 Slam averages, Djokovic edges Murray in pretty much all of the key categories.


Grand Slam Averages 2012(completed tournaments)

When we compare there averages from 2011 to 2012, you can see Djokovic's form overall has dipped a little bit. Murray's on the other hand has seen some improvement. They key observation I would make from Murray's stats is that his 1st serve percentage has increased slightly (2.03%). However, Djokovic's 1st serve percentage has dropped 3.3% in 2012. This could be on the reasons why he hasn't been so dominant.

Averages for 2011 v 2012

In Murray's favour is the fact he won their last meeting at the London 2012 Olympics 7-5, 7-5. This time it is a best of five so expect a battle.

The stats would suggest for Murray to win the 2012 US Open he needs to throw caution to the wind and remain calm as he has done so well since the Wimbledon final. Hitting winners on big points is something he did superbly at the Olympics, and will need to produce those moments again at Arthur Ashe.

Prediction: Murray in 4

Interesting fact: If Murray wins it will be the first time since 2003 that we will have four different winners of the four Slams. Big four share the Big four 2012, will that be the case?

Comments

The Big Four has become the Big Two - US Open 2016

There is no question that the Big Four of tennis is no longer. Whilst Federer and Nadal are still active and producing high level tennis, they don't have that edge anymore to win slams (hope they prove me wrong). The 'Big Two' has definitely been the case for the 2016 season as Murray and Djokovic have played each other in two finals at Australia and RG with Murray having made all 3 to date. Including the US Open Final of 2011, when Djokovic lost to Nadal, either Djokovic or Murray have been in 21 of the 24 finals since then. They have met in 7 of those finals and Djokovic leads the H2H 5-2. It feels like Murray's current form will see him take his fourth career Grand Slam in New York and I see Djokovic making the final, this will take the series to 5-3. The Lendl factor has by no coincidence changed Murray's fortune in their second stint together, he is such a calming influence on Murray and enables Murray to play his best tennis. In hindsight looking at the fi...

The GOAT battle is still alive.. Federer v Nadal

After today's easy win for Nadal, he now sits at 15 Grand Slam wins and only 3 behind Federer. Nadal wins his 10th Roland Garros title, another record! We all love the 'greatest of all time' debates in sport but in tennis being individual is a little more clean cut than team sports such as football... or is it? How do we begin to compare the greatest tennis players of all time? I mean we would expect Nadal or Federer to easily defeat Bjorn Borg or Rod Laver if they used the physical tools of their respective eras. Sport evolves and to call out the greatest of all time is always a hypothetical or statistical argument, but something that can never be proven no matter how emotional the debate becomes. In tennis circles, there is a rare concurrency in views that the greatest players in the history of the sport are still active.. very active based on the last two Grand Slam results. We usually wait until players finish out their careers so we can then apply our 'ob...

Is Djokovic the Villain in the Federer Pantomime?

The Federer v. Djokovic rivalry has become a classic hero v. villain narrative that has been played out 48 times to date. Like any of these stories, the longer the villain has power over the hero, the more anger is pointed towards the villain. The Hero Federer hits a forehand v Nadal at Wimbledon 2019 The dictionary tells us it is 'a person who is admired for their courage, outstanding achievements, or noble qualities.' Etymologically the word Hero comes from Greek hērōs meaning demi-god or illustrious man.This is of uncertain origin; perhaps originally "defender or protector". Roland Garros in the 1990s became even more specialised in terms of who had a chance of winning it outright. A lot of the champions at Roland Garros in the 90's and early 00's would see their only Grand Slam victories coming on the clay, that was the level of specialisation on that surface. When Nadal managed the RG and Wimbledon double in 2008 it was hailed as a miraculous...

Tennis Stats for The Big Four

Search This Blog