Skip to main content

Big Four no longer? Not just yet..


After another amazing Wimbledon Final yesterday, the question this tournament was are we seeing the end of the Big Four? Well two of the 'Big Four' just played out one of the greatest 5 set Wimbledon Finals in recent memory.

It's worth taking a look at the Grand Slam champions since 2003. That year saw Federer win his maiden slam at Wimbledon when he defeated Mark Philippoussis, 7–6, 6–2, 7–6. Fast forward to the current day and 44 Grand Slam tournaments later, the breakdown (Big Four only) is as follows:

  • Roger Feder: 25 Finals, 17 Wins
  • Rafael Nadal: 20 Finals, 14 Wins
  • Novak Djokovic: 14 Finals, 7 Wins
  • Andy Murray: 7 Finals, 2 Wins

Between these guys they have won 40 of the past 45 Grand Slams spanning 11 years. However, the Big Four wasn't truly born until 2008 when Djokovic won the Australian and Murray was a runner-up at the US Open that year to Federer. It was the Big One (Federer), then Big Two (add Nadal) and then Big Four.
2003United States Andre Agassi (8/8)Spain Juan Ferrero  SUI Roger Federer (1/17)United States Andy Roddick
2004Switzerland Roger Federer (2/17)Argentina Gastón GaudioSwitzerland Roger Federer (3/17)Switzerland Roger Federer (4/17)
2005Russia Marat Safin (2/2)Spain Rafael Nadal (1/14)Switzerland Roger Federer (5/17)Switzerland Roger Federer (6/17)
2006Switzerland Roger Federer (7/17)Spain Rafael Nadal (2/14)Switzerland Roger Federer (8/17)Switzerland Roger Federer (9/17)
2007Switzerland Roger Federer (10/17)Spain Rafael Nadal (3/14)Switzerland Roger Federer (11/17)Switzerland Roger Federer (12/17)
2008 Novak Djokovic (1/7)Spain Rafael Nadal (4/14)Spain Rafael Nadal (5/14)Switzerland Roger Federer (13/17)
2009Spain Rafael Nadal (6/14)Switzerland Roger Federer (14/17)Switzerland Roger Federer (15/17)Argentina Juan Martín del Potro
2010Switzerland Roger Federer (16/17)Spain Rafael Nadal (7/14)Spain Rafael Nadal (8/14)Spain Rafael Nadal (9/14)
2011Serbia Novak Djokovic (2/7)Spain Rafael Nadal (10/14)Serbia Novak Djokovic (3/7)Serbia Novak Djokovic (4/7)
2012Serbia Novak Djokovic (5/7)Spain Rafael Nadal (11/14)Switzerland Roger Federer (17/17)United Kingdom Andy Murray (1/2)
2013Serbia Novak Djokovic (6/7)Spain Rafael Nadal (12/14)United Kingdom Andy Murray (2/2)Spain Rafael Nadal (13/14)
2014Switzerland Stanislas WawrinkaSpain Rafael Nadal (14/14)Serbia Novak Djokovic (7/7)
Source: Wikipedia

Actually, apart from Wawrinka and Del Potro's solitary wins, the Big Four have dominated and continue to do so. There is no question however, that we are beginning to see a slight demise in some Big Four performances at the slams (for example Federer has only won 2 of his 17 slams since 2010). 

Let's look at the semi finalists for the past 7 Slams from beginning of 2013:

2013
Australian Open 2013: Djokovic v. Ferrer, Murray v. Federer (3/4)
Roland Garros (French Open) 2013: Djokovic v. Nadal, Ferrer v. Tsonga (2/4)
Wimbledon 2013: Djokovic v. Del Potro, Murray v. Janowicz (2/4)
US Open 2013: Djokovic v. Wawrinka, Nadal v. Gasquet (2/4)
2014
Australian Open 2014: Nadal v. Federer, Wawrinka v. Berdych (2/4)
Roland Garros (French Open) 2014: Nadal v. Murray, Djokovic v. Gulbis (3/4)
Wimbledon 2014: Djokovic v. Dimitrov, Federer v. Raonic (2/4)

In fact the last time the Big Four took all 4 semi-final berths was at Australia in 2012. With Wawrinka's breakthrough in January, and the emergence of Dimitrov and Raonic at Wimbledon it would seem like the Big Four's dominance is in more danger than ever. Can the new stars take the US Open? Or will we have to wait until 2015 to see new names emerge as GS winners. Whatever happens, this Golden Era of tennis is still strong today and a privilege to watch. 


Match Point Djokovic v. Federer at Wimbledon 2014 (forgive shakiness as I'm not a pro :))





Location: Wimbledon Chase, London SW20, UK

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Big Four has become the Big Two - US Open 2016

There is no question that the Big Four of tennis is no longer. Whilst Federer and Nadal are still active and producing high level tennis, they don't have that edge anymore to win slams (hope they prove me wrong).  The 'Big Two' has definitely been the case for the 2016 season as Murray and Djokovic have played each other in two finals at Australia and RG with Murray having made all 3 to date. Including the US Open Final of 2011, when Djokovic lost to Nadal, either Djokovic or Murray have been in 21 of the 24 finals since then. They have met in 7 of those finals and Djokovic leads the H2H 5-2. It feels like Murray's current form will see him take his fourth career Grand Slam in New York and I see Djokovic making the final, this will take the series to 5-3. The Lendl factor has by no coincidence changed Murray's fortune in their second stint together, he is such a calming influence on Murray and enables Murray to play his best tennis. In hindsight looking at the fi...
Post a Comment
Read more

The GOAT battle is still alive.. Federer v Nadal

After today's easy win for Nadal, he now sits at 15 Grand Slam wins and only 3 behind Federer. Nadal wins his 10th Roland Garros title, another record! We all love the 'greatest of all time' debates in sport but in tennis being individual is a little more clean cut than team sports such as football... or is it? How do we begin to compare the greatest tennis players of all time? I mean we would expect Nadal or Federer to easily defeat Bjorn Borg or Rod Laver if they used the physical tools of their respective eras. Sport evolves and to call out the greatest of all time is always a hypothetical or statistical argument, but something that can never be proven no matter how emotional the debate becomes. In tennis circles, there is a rare concurrency in views that the greatest players in the history of the sport are still active.. very active based on the last two Grand Slam results. We usually wait until players finish out their careers so we can then apply our 'ob...
Post a Comment
Read more

Is Djokovic the Villain in the Federer Pantomime?

The Federer v. Djokovic rivalry has become a classic hero v. villain narrative that has been played out 48 times to date. Like any of these stories, the longer the villain has power over the hero, the more anger is pointed towards the villain. The Hero  Federer hits a forehand v Nadal at Wimbledon 2019  The dictionary tells us it is 'a person who is admired for their courage, outstanding achievements, or noble qualities.' Etymologically the word Hero comes from Greek hērōs meaning demi-god or illustrious man.This is of uncertain origin; perhaps originally "defender or protector". Roland Garros in the 1990s became even more specialised in terms of who had a chance of winning it outright. A lot of the champions at Roland Garros in the 90's and early 00's would see their only Grand Slam victories coming on the clay, that was the level of specialisation on that surface. When Nadal managed the RG and Wimbledon double in 2008 it was hailed as a miraculous...
Post a Comment
Read more