Skip to main content

The Big Four is no longer a thing, Murray v Raonic preview

Only a day away to the final day of Wimbledon 2016, arguably the most important day in the tennis calendar. The final will see Andy Murray, one of that famous big four, take on Milos Raonic. This will be only their second meeting on grass, with the last just 3 weeks ago at Queen's Club. That match was very close and the level of tennis was very high, a feel for things to come.





Big serve
There is no doubt the big server still enjoys the benefits that grass serves up (no pun intended). The ball slides on the bounce and therefore a player such as Raonic will expect many easy points on his serve. So far this Wimbledon he has managed 137 aces in 6 matches. At Queen's Club the serving stats were very good for both players in their final. Murray served 74% on his 1st serve in that final, compared to 65% against Berdych and 61% against Tsonga is his last two Wimbledon matches. He will want to get that % up to Queen's level to ensure he protects himself for getting broke. 


      Murray                                                  Raonic     

Murray return
There is no question that Murray is one of the best returners in the history of tennis, perhaps only Agassi and Djokovic could be deemed as better. His returning ability in vital moments at Queen's got him the victory, of which Murray admitted it was a bit of a guessing game after the match: "I guessed on a few serves and gained a bit of confidence on the returns but he's got a huge serve and sometimes it's just too good."
To highlight Murray's last words on Raonic's serve being sometimes too good, see the top ace makers in this year's Wimbledon to date:


Raonic is averaging almost 23 Aces per match which equates to almost a free set. Against Federer in the semi-final he managed exactly that number. Federer's challenge faded in the fifth and a lack of match practice this year appeared to show in the closing stages. On the other hand the 25 year old Raonic looks extremely fit and has an impressive and sizeable physique. 

Murray's guess is as good as anyone
The Murray guessing game in Sunday's final will likely decide who will win the Wimbledon trophy. The expectation is that Murray will get enough break points and breaks to ensure he wins the title. However, I wouldn't underestimate the improvements Raonic has made to his all round game. He hit 75 winners to Federer's 40 in the semi-final and showed he has a fine tennis brain in some of the longer rallies against the Swiss artist. 

Murray to get his second
Overall, the scene looks set for Murray to claim his second Wimbledon trophy and his third slam in total. If anyone deserves another slam it has to be Murray. This year his form has been as good as ever, and only for a certain Djokovic he would likely have many more than 2 slams to date. 
I also think Federer's fitness levels helped Raonic as that match wore on. The 5 setter against Cilic had taken it out of the 34 year old's legs. Murray will not tire, he seems to get stronger as matches wear on, a quality he shares with Djokovic. No doubt Murray will feel pressure at certain times and the one sided crowd will be a reminder of the magnitude of the opportunity. 
Raonic has nothing to lose and should enjoy his first slam final. His serve means he will have a shot at the title and his improving groundstrokes will cause Murray concern. 
In the end I see Murray winning this in 4 sets, with Raonic taking one of the sets in a breaker. 


More information on their previous head to heads can be found on the ATP site here.

Good luck to the Scott and the Canadian, should be another memorable final at the famous Centre Court.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Big Four has become the Big Two - US Open 2016

There is no question that the Big Four of tennis is no longer. Whilst Federer and Nadal are still active and producing high level tennis, they don't have that edge anymore to win slams (hope they prove me wrong).  The 'Big Two' has definitely been the case for the 2016 season as Murray and Djokovic have played each other in two finals at Australia and RG with Murray having made all 3 to date. Including the US Open Final of 2011, when Djokovic lost to Nadal, either Djokovic or Murray have been in 21 of the 24 finals since then. They have met in 7 of those finals and Djokovic leads the H2H 5-2. It feels like Murray's current form will see him take his fourth career Grand Slam in New York and I see Djokovic making the final, this will take the series to 5-3. The Lendl factor has by no coincidence changed Murray's fortune in their second stint together, he is such a calming influence on Murray and enables Murray to play his best tennis. In hindsight looking at the fi...

The GOAT battle is still alive.. Federer v Nadal

After today's easy win for Nadal, he now sits at 15 Grand Slam wins and only 3 behind Federer. Nadal wins his 10th Roland Garros title, another record! We all love the 'greatest of all time' debates in sport but in tennis being individual is a little more clean cut than team sports such as football... or is it? How do we begin to compare the greatest tennis players of all time? I mean we would expect Nadal or Federer to easily defeat Bjorn Borg or Rod Laver if they used the physical tools of their respective eras. Sport evolves and to call out the greatest of all time is always a hypothetical or statistical argument, but something that can never be proven no matter how emotional the debate becomes. In tennis circles, there is a rare concurrency in views that the greatest players in the history of the sport are still active.. very active based on the last two Grand Slam results. We usually wait until players finish out their careers so we can then apply our 'ob...

Is Djokovic the Villain in the Federer Pantomime?

The Federer v. Djokovic rivalry has become a classic hero v. villain narrative that has been played out 48 times to date. Like any of these stories, the longer the villain has power over the hero, the more anger is pointed towards the villain. The Hero  Federer hits a forehand v Nadal at Wimbledon 2019  The dictionary tells us it is 'a person who is admired for their courage, outstanding achievements, or noble qualities.' Etymologically the word Hero comes from Greek hērōs meaning demi-god or illustrious man.This is of uncertain origin; perhaps originally "defender or protector". Roland Garros in the 1990s became even more specialised in terms of who had a chance of winning it outright. A lot of the champions at Roland Garros in the 90's and early 00's would see their only Grand Slam victories coming on the clay, that was the level of specialisation on that surface. When Nadal managed the RG and Wimbledon double in 2008 it was hailed as a miraculous...