Skip to main content

Murray's first serve percentage and it's impact

Andy Murray will step into the Rod Laver Arena to face Novak Djokovic for their 11th meeting of their professional careers on Friday. Interestingly, this is only their second meeting in a Grand Slam. Their only other meeting at a Slam ended in a straight sets victory in last year's Australian Open final.

Having a look at first serve averages for both players from all matches played at last year's four Slams, the stats tell a very interesting story. The points won when first serve goes in is almost  identical with only 0.02% of difference. This makes intriguing reading considering this average is taken over 27 matches for Djokovic (one walkover) and 25 for Murray.

The stats would tell us get if either of these guys gets a first serve in, they'll win 76.1 (give or take a tenth %) of those points. The trouble for Murray is that he got less than 60% of first serves in whilst Djokovic finished close to 70%.









 Djokovic  Murray
1st Serve % 68.01 59.46
1st Serve Points Won 76.09 76.11






 


If Murray wants to beat Djokovic and make it 1-1 in Grand Slam matchups, then he needs to find his rythmn on first serves. It is one of a number of important factors, but this one is certainly key.

More interesting stats to follow, so keep me a lookout.



Location: London, UK

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The GOAT battle is still alive.. Federer v Nadal

After today's easy win for Nadal, he now sits at 15 Grand Slam wins and only 3 behind Federer. Nadal wins his 10th Roland Garros title, another record! We all love the 'greatest of all time' debates in sport but in tennis being individual is a little more clean cut than team sports such as football... or is it? How do we begin to compare the greatest tennis players of all time? I mean we would expect Nadal or Federer to easily defeat Bjorn Borg or Rod Laver if they used the physical tools of their respective eras. Sport evolves and to call out the greatest of all time is always a hypothetical or statistical argument, but something that can never be proven no matter how emotional the debate becomes. In tennis circles, there is a rare concurrency in views that the greatest players in the history of the sport are still active.. very active based on the last two Grand Slam results. We usually wait until players finish out their careers so we can then apply our 'ob...
Post a Comment
Read more

Big 4 becomes Big 3 for Australian Open

As we enter the first slam of 2013, let's have a look at a very e xciting year ahead for the Big Four... o r will it be the B ig Three? Novak Djokovic Novak enters the 2013 Australian Open as World Number 1 and favourite to retain his title . He is going for his 4th win in Melbourne and his 6th Slam in total (same number of slam wins as Becker and Edberg). Having attended Novak's last big final at the ATP World Tour finals in London, he finished the 2012 season in style. His biggest strength now is belief and confidence to turn situations in his favour. Against Federer and Murray in that tournament Novak showed great guile, both in terms of play and psychology to get the edge in these victories. For that reason I see Novak dominating 2013, potentially getting the 'Grand Slam'. A ustralian Open Pre dictions 1st Round v. Paul-Henri Mathieu :   Head to Head : First meeting   Prediction: This will be a straight sets victory for Novak . The last time Novak lo...
Post a Comment
Read more

The Big Three Domination, is there an end in sight?

The Big Four has been the Big Three for longer than we think Whilst in the past we discussed the 'Big Four', it really has been only the 'Big Three' (referred to as BT) all along when we look back in time. Murray was a great challenger to the BT but as time moves on, the BT with Andy just outside it makes more sense than discussing a 'Big Four'. Nadal in action at Wimbledon 2019 Nadal's win at US Open Some will suggest that Rafa got an 'easy' US Open win by not having to defeat his toughest rivals en-route to the title. Federer and Djokovic both went out rather timidly. Federer went out in 5 sets to Dimitrov in the Quarter final and was clearly struggling with back pain. Djokovic had to retire in his Round of 16 match against Wawrinka. You could argue that this made it a more straightforward title for Nadal (I am sure Medvedev would argue this point). When we look at the data it provides some interesting insights. Below shows Grand...
Post a Comment
Read more