Skip to main content

Interesting Grand Slam stats from 2011 for Federer and Nadal


Very close in many ways..
As Federer and Nadal go into battle for the 29th time, their past throws up some interesting stats. Nadal leads the head to head 17-9 with 9 Grand Slams matches, out of which Federer has only won 2. His last victory came in one the five setter epic Wimbledon finals back in 2007.

2011 was supposedly a year in which Federer went into decline, but when broken down into plain numbers it doesn't seem that way at all. It is actually quite close overall, but one thing that may gain attention is how Nadal seems to work harder for his points. As shown below, Nadal took an average of 20 minutes more to finish a match. The numbers would also suggest Nadal was much more aggressive on the opponents second serve. However, Federer's serving stats are more solid and he would appear to get easier points on both first and second serves. 

The coolest stat is the fact that they won the exact same percentage of points played over the four slams at 56.2% (Djokovic finished with an average 57.38 and Murray with 54.39).

Numbers for Grand Slam events 2011: 
































































Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The GOAT battle is still alive.. Federer v Nadal

After today's easy win for Nadal, he now sits at 15 Grand Slam wins and only 3 behind Federer. Nadal wins his 10th Roland Garros title, another record! We all love the 'greatest of all time' debates in sport but in tennis being individual is a little more clean cut than team sports such as football... or is it? How do we begin to compare the greatest tennis players of all time? I mean we would expect Nadal or Federer to easily defeat Bjorn Borg or Rod Laver if they used the physical tools of their respective eras. Sport evolves and to call out the greatest of all time is always a hypothetical or statistical argument, but something that can never be proven no matter how emotional the debate becomes. In tennis circles, there is a rare concurrency in views that the greatest players in the history of the sport are still active.. very active based on the last two Grand Slam results. We usually wait until players finish out their careers so we can then apply our 'ob...
Post a Comment
Read more

Big 4 becomes Big 3 for Australian Open

As we enter the first slam of 2013, let's have a look at a very e xciting year ahead for the Big Four... o r will it be the B ig Three? Novak Djokovic Novak enters the 2013 Australian Open as World Number 1 and favourite to retain his title . He is going for his 4th win in Melbourne and his 6th Slam in total (same number of slam wins as Becker and Edberg). Having attended Novak's last big final at the ATP World Tour finals in London, he finished the 2012 season in style. His biggest strength now is belief and confidence to turn situations in his favour. Against Federer and Murray in that tournament Novak showed great guile, both in terms of play and psychology to get the edge in these victories. For that reason I see Novak dominating 2013, potentially getting the 'Grand Slam'. A ustralian Open Pre dictions 1st Round v. Paul-Henri Mathieu :   Head to Head : First meeting   Prediction: This will be a straight sets victory for Novak . The last time Novak lo...
Post a Comment
Read more

Is Djokovic the Villain in the Federer Pantomime?

The Federer v. Djokovic rivalry has become a classic hero v. villain narrative that has been played out 48 times to date. Like any of these stories, the longer the villain has power over the hero, the more anger is pointed towards the villain. The Hero  Federer hits a forehand v Nadal at Wimbledon 2019  The dictionary tells us it is 'a person who is admired for their courage, outstanding achievements, or noble qualities.' Etymologically the word Hero comes from Greek hērōs meaning demi-god or illustrious man.This is of uncertain origin; perhaps originally "defender or protector". Roland Garros in the 1990s became even more specialised in terms of who had a chance of winning it outright. A lot of the champions at Roland Garros in the 90's and early 00's would see their only Grand Slam victories coming on the clay, that was the level of specialisation on that surface. When Nadal managed the RG and Wimbledon double in 2008 it was hailed as a miraculous...
Post a Comment
Read more